Introduction
If you’ve promised a spring start and planning drifts into summer, you’re not alone. Many contractors are bumping into slower planning decisions and stretched building control slots right now. In general, householder decisions still aim for 8 weeks, but it’s common to see 9–12 weeks in busy councils, with inspections moving from next‑day to 2–5 days in peak months. That’s real risk to your start dates, cash flow, and client trust. This guide breaks down what’s changing, how it affects your pipeline, and the moves that actually work in the field. We’ll keep it practical—clear steps, realistic buffers, and examples you can use this week.
Table of Contents
Key Takeaways
- In general, householder planning decisions aim for 8 weeks but commonly run 9–12 weeks in busy councils; inspections often slip from next‑day to 2–5 days in peak periods.
- It’s common for 20–30% of start‑date slippage to be approvals‑related; a 10–15% schedule float typically absorbs routine drift.
- Neighbour consultations frequently add 2–3 weeks; validation queries and missing documents can add another 1–2 weeks.
- Price validity and programme clauses protect margin when approvals overrun; many contractors use 14–30 day price holds with review triggers.
- Clear, planning‑dependent proposals and a simple weekly client update rhythm cut back‑and‑forth and reduce cancellations.
Where We Are Now: The Approval Bottleneck
Planning Decisions Are Taking Longer
Problem: You price a small rear extension, the client expects an 8‑week decision, and it drifts to 11 weeks after consultation, validation queries, and officer workload.
Solution: Plan for the real world. Build a buffer for neighbour consultation (commonly 2–3 weeks) and a validation recheck (often 1–2 weeks). Make your proposal sequence planning‑dependent and set a review point before ordering long‑lead materials.
Typical Householder Timeline
- Validation: 1–2 weeks once submitted (longer if documents or drawings are incomplete).
- Consultation: Commonly 2–3 weeks, sometimes overlapping with assessment.
- Decision target: 8 weeks; in general, busy authorities run to 9–12 weeks.
Example: A contractor builds in a 3‑week float after the statutory target. When the decision lands at week 10, the team still starts within the committed window and avoids reshuffling three other jobs.
Building Control Is Under Pressure Too
Problem: Inspection slots that used to be next‑day now take 2–5 working days in peak months. That stalls concrete pours, insulation cover‑ups, and handovers.
Solution: Request inspections earlier, bundle checks where possible, and keep a small list of non‑destructive tasks the crew can switch to if an inspection slips.
Inspection Slots: What to Expect
- Booking windows: Commonly 2–5 working days in peak periods; quicker off‑season.
- Rebooking cost: Contractors often report 5–10 working days lost per quarter to inspection re‑scheduling when they don’t plan buffers.
Example: For a loft, you book structural check two days ahead and line up fire‑stopping work in the meantime. If the slot moves, you still progress and avoid idle time.
Whats Changing In 2025
Design Codes and Neighbour Amenity Are Front and Centre
Problem: Even small works get more scrutiny on street character, overlooking, and daylight.
Solution: Expect officers to lean on local design guides. Flag privacy screens, obscure glazing, and roofline alignment in your notes early so your designer can incorporate them.
Validation Standards Are Tighter
Problem: Incomplete drawings, missing site photos, or unclear materials notes trigger validation queries and add 1–2 weeks.
Solution: Front‑load clarity. Many contractors find that a short written scope with annotated photos prevents validation ping‑pong.
Enforcement Attention Is Higher
Problem: Clients are more cautious about “build now, regularise later.” That can slow go/no‑go decisions.
Solution: Offer a PD‑first filter (see below). If it’s not permitted development, set a realistic programme with explicit approval dependencies.
How Delays Hit Your Business
Problem: Approvals drift creates a domino effect—crew idle time, wasted delivery slots, and churn with your subs.
- In general, contractors report 20–30% of start‑date slippage ties back to planning or inspection lag.
- Price holds: Many teams operate with 14–30 day price validity; beyond that, supplier changes and labour costs can eat margin.
- Client confidence: When dates move twice, cancellation risk climbs.
Solution: Convert approvals uncertainty into structured buffers, clear clauses, and small fallback tasks.
Example: You maintain a rolling 2‑week micro‑job list (repairs, small interiors) to fill gaps. A 12‑day planning overrun turns into billable work, not dead time.
Practical Moves That Work
Use a PD Filter Before You Promise Dates
Problem: You pencil a start date, then find the dormer is outside PD and needs full permission.
Solution: Run a simple PD filter up front and set expectations.
Quick PD Checks (Householder)
- Roof volume and position; dormer set‑backs and highway views.
- Rear extension depth/height vs local guidance; materials in keeping.
- Side windows and overlooking mitigation.
- Any Article 4 or conservation restrictions in the area.
Example: You flag that a full‑width dormer likely needs permission. The client opts for rooflights now and a separate dormer application later—work proceeds without a long pause.
Write Proposals That Survive Delays
Problem: Vague proposals collapse when timelines shift.
Solution: Build planning‑dependent sequencing and clear review triggers into the offer.
Clauses That Help (Plain English)
- Planning dependency: “Structural works and groundworks commence only after written approval is confirmed.”
- Price validity: “Pricing valid for 30 days or until planning decision, whichever is later; thereafter subject to supplier review.”
- Programme buffer: “Allow 2–4 weeks float for approvals and inspections.” In general, a 10–15% float absorbs routine drift.
- Long‑lead orders: “Placed only after approval; lead times may affect start date.”
Build Buffers and Fillers Into Your Programme
Problem: One late inspection stalls the whole week.
Solution: Keep a ready list of 1–3 day interior jobs your crew can pivot to. Pre‑agree with those clients that dates may be brought forward.
Comparison: Handling Approvals Risk
| Approach | Current Risk | Improvement |
|---|
| Promise fixed start before approvals | Date slips; cancellations | Sequence is planning‑dependent; maintain 2–4 week float |
| Order long‑lead items early | Waste if design changes | Order after approval; communicate lead‑time impact |
| No fallback work | Crew idle, cashflow dips | Maintain micro‑job queue and call‑forward agreements |
Keep a Simple Client Update Rhythm
Problem: Silence breeds doubt; doubt breeds cancellations.
Solution: Weekly one‑line updates during approvals: what happened, what’s next, and any impact on dates. Many contractors find this halves inbound “any news?” messages and keeps clients calm during waits.
Real-World Scenarios
Rear Extension With Slipping Decision
Problem: Decision slips from week 8 to week 10 after a neighbour objection.
Solution: Your proposal already allowed a 3‑week float and tied groundworks to approval. You slide the start by 10 days and slot a bathroom refresh into the gap.
Outcome: Zero idle days; the client stays confident because you communicated weekly and had a realistic buffer.
Loft Dormer Pivot
Problem: Dormer likely needs permission; client wants progress now.
Solution: You propose a PD‑compliant rooflight conversion first, then a separate dormer application. Proposal clearly separates phases and dependencies.
Outcome: Revenue this month; no breach of rules; dormer proceeds later with a clean approval.
Problem: Admin expands when approvals drag—more notes, more updates, and revised proposals.
Solution: Capture once, generate fast, and make sign‑off easy.
- Voice to Proposal: On site, speak the scope and snap photos. Donizo turns that into a professional proposal fast—contractors often recover 2–3 hours per week they used to lose typing.
- Send Proposal and E‑Signature: Email a branded PDF with client portal access and get a legally binding e‑sign so “planning‑dependent” terms are clear and accepted.
- Invoice Management: When approval lands and work begins, convert the accepted proposal to an invoice in one click and track payments.
- Plans and Options: The free Discover plan gives unlimited proposals with e‑signature and PDF export (with watermark). Paid plans add custom branding, invoicing and payment tracking, basic templates, and an analytics dashboard to see what’s getting accepted fastest.
Result: Less admin while approvals tick along, clearer expectations for clients, and fewer back‑and‑forth edits.
Frequently Asked Questions
How Much Buffer Should I Allow Around Planning?
In general, build 2–4 weeks float after the 8‑week target for householder applications. Busy councils often run to 9–12 weeks, and neighbour consultations commonly add 2–3 weeks. If your job relies on approval to start, keep the programme planning‑dependent and use a 10–15% float across the schedule.
Should I Price Before Planning Approval?
Yes, but set guardrails. Offer a planning‑dependent sequence, a 14–30 day price validity window, and a review trigger after the decision. Make long‑lead orders conditional on approval. This keeps the client engaged without exposing you to rework or waste.
How Do I Handle Materials During Long Approvals?
Confirm lead times and availability but don’t place firm orders until approval. State this in your proposal. For volatile items, include a supplier review clause post‑decision. Many contractors also keep alternates ready in case specification or availability changes.
What If Building Control Can’t Attend When I Need Them?
Book early, bundle inspections where possible, and prepare non‑destructive tasks to fill the day if a slot slips. Keep photos and notes ready so minor queries can be closed quickly. Contractors often report losing 5–10 working days per quarter to rebooking—buffers and fallback tasks claw a lot of that back.
Can I Start Any Work While Planning Is Pending?
You can typically progress internal, like‑for‑like repairs or PD‑compliant elements, but avoid any works that depend on the approval. Confirm with your designer and the client, and document the sequence clearly in your proposal.
Conclusion
Approvals aren’t broken—they’re just slower than homeowners expect right now. If you price with planning‑dependent sequences, build in small buffers, line up filler work, and keep weekly updates, you protect dates, margin, and trust. Use Donizo to capture the scope by voice on site, send a clear branded proposal with e‑signature, and convert the accepted offer to an invoice when the green light lands. That’s fewer admin nights and more time building.